USPTO serial 99442467
FANO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 641Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GILLANI, MAHREEN A
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Deadline: November 25, 2026
Need help with FANO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Office Action issues
The examiner requires an amendment to clarify the identification of goods and services, has refused registration based on a likelihood of confusion with existing registered marks, and noted a potential conflict with a prior-filed pending application.
Section 2(d): Likelihood of Confusion
Cited marks: 99498233
Cited marks: 99498233
Owner
Guilford, CT, US
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Card games; Educational card games; Trading card games; Playmats for card games; Playing cards and card games; Equipment sold as a unit for playing card games; Playing card game accessories, namely, playing card cases, playing card holders, mats for use in connection with playing card games, playing card shuffling devices and dice; Tabletop games comprised of cards, dice, stickers, tokens, etc.; Game cards; Promotional game cards; Gaming equipment, namely, playing cards, chips, gaming tables and gaming cloths; Game equipment set sold as a unit comprised primarily of a playing board and playing cards and also including rules of play, dry erase boards and erasers, markers, a timer and T-shirts | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 25, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 25, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 25, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 6, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 6, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 6, 2026 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 4, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 4, 2026 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2026 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 4, 2026 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 26, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 26, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 12, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 21, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 11, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 14, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |