USPTO serial 99444937
AXON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 653
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAWRENCE, SUSAN KASTRINER
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AXON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Scottsdale, AZ, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Justin Powley
17800 N. 85TH STREETScottsdale, AZ 85255United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electronic transmitters for jamming signals; Motion sensors; Radio frequency (RF) sensors; Electronic sensors for detecting remotely operated devices; Electronic sensors for object detection; Radar apparatus; Targeted radio wave device, namely, radio wave transmitting device for disrupting operation of remotely operated devices; Drone detection system comprised of computer hardware, electronic sensors, and recorded software for detecting, identifying, and monitoring remotely operated devices; Drone defense system comprised of computer hardware, electronic sensors, and recorded software for disrupting operation of remotely operated devices; Downloadable software for detecting, identifying, and monitoring remotely operated devices; Downloadable software for disrupting operation of remotely operated devices; Downloadable software for historical air traffic reporting and analytics, event-triggered control of external systems, and communication with unmanned aerial vehicles for use in unmanned aerial vehicle defense | ACTIVE | Oct 2, 2024 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 29, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 10, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 10, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 10, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 9, 2026 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Jun 9, 2026 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| May 27, 2026 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 27, 2026 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 27, 2026 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 9, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 15, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 15, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |