USPTO serial 99449406
ARTIFICIAL BENEFITS INTELLIGENCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 661
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ORDOGNE, ROBERT J
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 126
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ARTIFICIAL BENEFITS INTELLIGENCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lynn M. Jordan
Lynn M. Jordan Kelly IP, LLP1150 Connecticut Avenue NW, Suite 600Washington, DC 20036United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable electronic publications, namely eBooks in the field of employees' benefits | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Design and development, installation, maintenance and updating of computer software relating to employees' benefits; creating and maintaining bespoke technology software platforms and websites relating to employees' benefits; providing temporary use of non-downloadable software for analysing data and generating reports in the field of employees' benefits; software as a service [SaaS] featuring computer software for determining employees' benefits; platform as a service [PaaS] featuring computer software for determining employees' benefits; programming of software for Internet platforms relating to employees' benefits; technical support services regarding software relating to employees' benefits, namely, providing on-line support services for computer software users being the installation, administration, and troubleshooting of web and database applications; Software as a service (SaaS) services featuring online non-downloadable software for performing workplace administration of employees' benefits; Software as a service (SaaS) services featuring online non-downloadable integrated technology software platform for use by employers and employees in managing and processing information and data relating to employees' benefits; Software as a service (SaaS) services featuring online non-downloadable communication software for reporting and providing real-time information in the field of employees' benefits; Software as a service (SaaS) services featuring online non-downloadable software for the creation and management of on-line computer databases and on-line searchable databases, relating to employees' benefits; Software as a service (SaaS) services featuring online non-downloadable software for use in the collection, analysis, storage, retrieval, maintenance, management and administration of information and data relating to employees' benefits; information, consultancy and advisory services relating to any of the aforesaid services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 17, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 17, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 17, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 18, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 24, 2025 | TAEA | TEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED | — |
| Oct 24, 2025 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 17, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 17, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |