Drawing for SCOUT AI

USPTO serial 99449958

SCOUT AI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 654
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CAYSIDO, REBECCA TOLENTINO
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 123

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SCOUT AI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kari Moyer-Henry

Kari Moyer-Henry Lewis Kohn & Walker LLP17085 Via Del CampoSan Diego, CA 92127United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Providing information in the field of golf, namely, providing an online automated database featuring information on golf instruction and golf courses and the conditions of the golf course via voice-controlled automated inquiriesACTIVE—
042Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring artificial intelligence (AI) software for use as an AI assistant for providing golf instruction and data on golf course conditionsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 27, 2026RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 30, 2026GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 30, 2026GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 30, 2026CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 25, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 25, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 25, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 17, 2026GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 17, 2026GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 17, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 12, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 11, 2026NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 17, 2025MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Oct 17, 2025NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance