USPTO serial 99450900
CALVRIS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 653
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MARTIN, CHRISTINE C
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CALVRIS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
West Hartford, CT, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Nila K. Jackson
Nila K. Jackson Law Office of Nila Kay JacksonP.O. Box 802Front Royal, VA 22630United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Shampoos; Body wash; Body milk; Depilatory creams; Body creams; Facial creams; Hair creams; Sunscreen creams; Moisturising creams; Non-medicated skin creams; Non-medicated balm for hair; Non-medicated cosmetic soap; Shampoo-conditioners; Exfoliating scrubs for cosmetic purposes | ACTIVE | Jun 30, 2025 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 30, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 27, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 27, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 27, 2026 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 27, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 24, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 24, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 24, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 24, 2026 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2026 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 24, 2026 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 23, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 23, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 9, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 6, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 11, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 19, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |