USPTO serial 99451974
DARLIN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 661
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- INGRAM, KYLE G
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 125
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DARLIN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark Andrew Goldstein
Mark Andrew Goldstein SoCal IP Law Group LLP310 N Westlake Bvld., Suite 120Westlake Village, CA 91362United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business management consultant; Commercial or industrial management assistance; Auctioneering; Retailing and wholesaling of computer software; Retailing and wholesaling of computer hardware; Retailing and wholesaling of computer accessories; Online retail for downloadable digital music; Online retail for downloadable digital audio files authenticated by non-fungible tokens [NFTs]; Online retail for downloadable ring tones; Online retail for downloadable and pre-recorded music; Online retail for downloadable and pre-recorded movies; Online retail services for downloadable virtual product image files; Retail services relating to downloadable digital image files authenticated by non-fungible tokens [NFTs]; Online retail services for downloadable virtual clothing; Online retail services for downloadable image files | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer animation design for others; Computer-aided graphic design services; Computer programming; Weather prediction being weather forecasting; Development of video and computer games; Development of video and computer game software; Hosting software platforms for virtual reality-based work collaboration; Updating of computer software; Maintenance of computer software; Computer hardware research; Computer software research | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 1, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 1, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 1, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 1, 2026 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 30, 2026 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Jun 30, 2026 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 1, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 1, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 1, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 6, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 11, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 20, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |