USPTO serial 99458716
CARMEUSE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 641Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GEARHART, DAVID JAMES
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with CARMEUSE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
CARMEUSE RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY
Ottignies-Louvain-la-Neuve, BE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael E. Dukes
Michael E. Dukes Dentons Cohen & Grigsby, P.C.625 Liberty Ave.Pittsburgh, PA 15222United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | Building construction services; repair and installation services relating to buildings and industrial equipment; building construction consultancy; installation, maintenance and repair of machines; quarrying services | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Scientific and technological services, as well as research and design relating thereto, namely, scientific research in the field of lime, calcium, and mineral-based products and processes; industrial analysis and research services, namely, industrial research and design; design and development of computer hardware and software for industrial installations and industrial equipment; engineering; mechanical research; consultant services with respect to design and development of computer hardware for industrial installations and industrial equipment; conducting technical project studies. | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 7, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 7, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 7, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 11, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 11, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 11, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 12, 2026 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Jun 12, 2026 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 12, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 11, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 27, 2025 | TAEA | TEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED | — |
| Oct 27, 2025 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 23, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |