USPTO serial 99463838
KABOBS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 661
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BRENNER, BRANDI M
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 137
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with KABOBS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jennifer M. Mikulina
Jennifer M. Mikulina McDermott Will & Schulte LLP444 West Lake Street, Suite 4000Chicago, IL 60606-0029United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Antipasto; Bacon; Battered and fried meat; Battered and fried vegetables; Cheese-based snack foods; Crab cakes; Frozen appetizers consisting primarily of chicken or seafood; Hash browns; Meat; Meat-based snack foods; Potato pancakes; Prepared side dishes consisting primarily of vegetables; Preserved, frozen, dried or cooked vegetables; Satay; Shepherd's pie; Shrimps, not live; Tempura seafood; Corn souffles; Pea souffles; Sweet potato souffles | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Arancini; Arepas; Battered and fried macaroni and cheese; Biscuits; Breakfast burritos; Buns; Burritos; Cakes; Calzones; Cheeseburger sandwiches; Cheesecakes; Corn cakes containing combinations of meat, cheese, beans and/or vegetables; Empanadas; Flat bread; Flour-based stuffed dumplings; Hot dog sandwiches; Macaroni with cheese; Oatmeal; Pastries; Petits fours; Pies; Pigs-in-a-blanket; Pizza; Pot pies; Profiteroles; Puffed pastries filled with cheese and fruit; Puffed pastries filled with cheese and vegetables; Puffed pastries filled with cheese, fruit, and nuts; Puffed pastries filled with cheese, fruit, and vegetables; Puffed pastries filled with meat; Puffed pastries filled with mushrooms; Puffed pastries filled with sweet potato and nuts; Puffed pastries filled with vegetables; Quiche; Samosas; Sandwiches; Sausage rolls; Spanakopita, namely, spinach and feta pie in phyllo dough; Spring rolls; Taco shells; Tacos; Tamales; Tart shells; Tarts; Wontons; Wrap sandwiches | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 26, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 26, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 26, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 3, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 3, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 3, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 17, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 17, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 24, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 11, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 27, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |