USPTO serial 99464448
IMI A DCS COMPANY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 661
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HILLIARD, JESSICA LYNN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 120
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with IMI A DCS COMPANY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Matthew G. McKinney
Matthew G. McKinney Allen, Dyer, Doppelt & Gilchrist, P.A.255 S. Orange Ave.Suite 1401Orlando, FL 32801Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | Installation, maintenance and repair of industrial machinery, namely, physical industrial conveyor machinery and industrial material handling machinery; all of the foregoing excluding installation, maintenance, and repair services relating to valves, valve slides, valve flaps, fluid-control systems, flow-control systems, HVAC systems, hydronics systems, oil and gas process systems, fossil power process systems, nuclear power process systems, petrochemical process systems, desalination process systems, electronics, computer hardware, and computer software. | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | Custom fabrication of industrial machinery, namely, physical industrial conveyor machinery and industrial material handling machinery; all of the foregoing excluding electronics contract manufacturing and assembly of electronic products for others. | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 8, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 8, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 8, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 8, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 8, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 8, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 17, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 17, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 17, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 3, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 3, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 3, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 23, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 20, 2026 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 27, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |