Drawing for S SAPIKAS TECHNOLOGIES

USPTO serial 99464551

S SAPIKAS TECHNOLOGIES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 681
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DIBBLE,JENNA M
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with S SAPIKAS TECHNOLOGIES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Laser welding machines; Laser cutting machines; Fiber laser cutting machinesACTIVEOct 14, 2023

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 26, 2026CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 22, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 22, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 22, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 22, 2026NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Sep 22, 2026PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Sep 22, 2026PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jul 10, 2026MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 10, 2026ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 26, 2026GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 26, 2026GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 26, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 11, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 9, 2026MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Mar 8, 2026NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 27, 2025MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Oct 27, 2025NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance