USPTO serial 99465731
INVENCI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 651
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAJCHER HARTNETT, MEGAN K
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with INVENCI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Mississauga, ON, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Laura J. Winston
Laura J. Winston Offit Kurman, P.A.590 Madison Ave., 6th FloorNew York, NY 10022United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business administration consulting services in the field of artificial intelligence; business consultancy in the field of machine learning and artificial intelligence; business data curation, namely, business data analysis and compiling business data for artificial intelligence (AI) development | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Technical consultancy in the field of artificial intelligence (AI) solutions and software to assist with business optimization and realize a measurable ROI | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Artificial intelligence technology consultancy; computer technology consultation in the field of machine learning and artificial intelligence; research in the field of artificial intelligence technology; software as a service (SAAS) featuring non-downloadable computer software for the integration of artificial intelligence and machine learning in the field of Big Data for business data analytics and user behavior analytics; technical consulting in the field of artificial intelligence software customization; custom design and development of computer software incorporating artificial intelligence for others; maintenance of computer software incorporating artificial intelligence; technical support services, namely, troubleshooting of computer software problems related to artificial intelligence systems; monitoring of computer systems implementing artificial intelligence for technical purposes to detect cyber security incidents, monitor operations by remote access, and ensure proper operational function of related solutions developed in-house. | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 13, 2026 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 10, 2026 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 2, 2026 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2026 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 1, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 4, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 16, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 16, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 16, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 13, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 10, 2026 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 28, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |