Drawing for WHERE INTELLIGENCE MEETS INNOVATION

USPTO serial 99465751

WHERE INTELLIGENCE MEETS INNOVATION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 651
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MAJCHER HARTNETT, MEGAN K
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 123

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WHERE INTELLIGENCE MEETS INNOVATION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Laura J. Winston

Laura J. Winston Offit Kurman, P.A.590 Madison Ave., 6th FloorNew York, NY 10022United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Business administration consulting services in the field of artificial intelligence; business consultancy in the field of machine learning and artificial intelligence; business data curation, namely, business data analysis and compiling business data for artificial intelligence (AI) developmentACTIVE—
037Technical consultancy in the field of artificial intelligence (AI) solutions and software to assist with business optimization and realize a measurable ROI.ACTIVE—
042Artificial intelligence technology consultancy; computer technology consultation in the field of machine learning and artificial intelligence; research in the field of artificial intelligence technology; software as a service (SAAS) featuring non-downloadable computer software for the integration of artificial intelligence and machine learning in the field of Big Data for business data analytics and user behavior analytics; technical consulting in the field of artificial intelligence software customization; custom design and development of computer software incorporating artificial intelligence for others; maintenance of computer software incorporating artificial intelligence; technical support services, namely, troubleshooting of computer software problems related to artificial intelligence systems; monitoring of computer systems implementing artificial intelligence for technical purposes to detect cyber security incidents, monitor operations by remote access, and ensure proper operational function of related solutions developed in-house.ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 2, 2026GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 2, 2026CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Nov 1, 2026RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
May 4, 2026GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 4, 2026GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 4, 2026CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Apr 16, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 16, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 16, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 13, 2026GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 13, 2026GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 13, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 12, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 28, 2025MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Oct 28, 2025NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 28, 2025NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance