USPTO serial 99467388
KYA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 661
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- OGUNFEMI, RASHEEDAT
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 131
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with KYA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Francisco, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephen D. Lott
Stephen D. Lott Seyfarth Shaw LLP300 S. Tryon StreetSuite 400Charlotte, NC 28202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | payment verification services; cryptocurrency or blockchain-based payment verification services; financial transaction services, namely, providing secure commercial transactions and payment options; merchant services, namely, payment transaction processing services; providing secure financial transactions and payment options; payment processing services featuring artificial intelligence-native infrastructure for both business to business (B2B) and business to consumer (B2C) transactions | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | application service provider (ASP) featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for verifying identities and facilitating payments; providing online non-downloadable computer software using artificial intelligence (AI) for providing tools for account creation, payments, and integration through application programming interfaces (APIs); providing user authentication services using artificial intelligence (AI) for e-commerce transactions; user authentication services using blockchain technology for facilitating payments; user authentication services using technology for e-commerce transactions; software-as-a-service (SaaS) and platform-as-a-service (PaaS) for artificial intelligence workflows, digital identity verification, payment infrastructures, wallet management, and content generation; software-as-a-service (SaaS) featuring artificial intelligence-driven payment infrastructure, workflow orchestration, and compliance automation; providing online non-downloadable software for artificial intelligence agent management, digital identity verification, and financial data interoperability; platform as a service (PaaS) featuring artificial intelligence-native application program interfaces (APIs) enabling developers and enterprises to integrate stablecoin payments and automated workflows; development of artificial intelligence-based fintech solutions for decentralized commerce, micropayments, and subscription-free models | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 20, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 20, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 20, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 20, 2026 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Jul 20, 2026 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 20, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 20, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 20, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 11, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 28, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |