Drawing for ULTRA CLEAN

USPTO serial 99467925

ULTRA CLEAN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 653
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
NANNEY, KATHERINE N
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 132

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ULTRA CLEAN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Yael Rouach Cabilly

Yael Rouach Cabilly Cabilly & Co.101 West 67 Streetc/o CabillyNew York, NY 10023

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003All-purpose cleaners; Cleaning preparations; Automobile cleaners; Cleaning preparations for automobiles, floors, bathrooms, ovens, grills, carpets, glass;; Glass cleaners; Carpet cleaners; Oven cleaners; Drain openers; Laundry detergent; Dishwashing detergents; Vehicle polishing preparations; Car wax; Car polish; Non-medicated soaps for hands; Body washACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 14, 2026GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 14, 2026GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 14, 2026CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Sep 23, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 23, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 23, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 19, 2026XELGAPPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED—
Jun 19, 2026XELRAPPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED—
Mar 23, 2026GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 23, 2026GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 23, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 12, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 9, 2026MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Mar 9, 2026NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 29, 2025MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Oct 29, 2025NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance