Drawing for ENGINEERED CRAFTSMANSHIP

USPTO serial 99468369

ENGINEERED CRAFTSMANSHIP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 681
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 24, 2026
Examiner
SOPER, HUNTER JUDSON LOUIS
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ENGINEERED CRAFTSMANSHIP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

KRISTY A. CHRISTENSEN

KRISTY A. CHRISTENSEN MCCARTY LAW LLP2401 East Enterprise AvenueAppleton, WI 54913United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
037Installation, maintenance and repair of machine equipment and machinery, tool and die equipment and foundry finishing equipmentACTIVESep 6, 2024
040Custom manufacturing of machine equipment and machinery, namely, foundry, tooling, automation, consumer packaging, printed circuit board, and custom-built industrial machine equipment and machinery, tool and die equipment and foundry finishing equipment for othersACTIVESep 6, 2024
041Training in the use of machine equipment and machinery, namely, foundry, tooling, automation, consumer packaging, printed circuit board, and custom-built industrial machine equipment and machinery, tool and die equipment and foundry finishing equipmentACTIVESep 6, 2024
042Custom design and engineering of machine equipment and machinery, tool and die equipment and foundry finishing equipmentACTIVESep 6, 2024

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 27, 2026CNTAAPPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER—
Oct 20, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 20, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 20, 2026ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Sep 22, 2026GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Sep 22, 2026GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 22, 2026CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 9, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 9, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 9, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 5, 2026XELGAPPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED—
Jun 5, 2026XELRAPPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED—
Mar 13, 2026GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 13, 2026GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 13, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 13, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 29, 2025MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Oct 29, 2025NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 29, 2025NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance