USPTO serial 99469761
MONTORO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 661
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BROWNE, LUCY E
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MONTORO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Novato, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JANN STANLEY MOORHEAD
43 La Crescenta WaySan Rafael, CA 94901United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Frozen seafood products, including Japanese and other Asian varieties; frozen value-added seafood products; frozen Asian-style appetizers consisting primarily of seafood or chicken, namely, tempura shrimp and chicken karaage; frozen Asian-style appetizers, namely, frozen potato-based dumplings; prepared Japanese-style food products consisting primarily of fish and seafood and also including rice, namely, sashimi; prepared Japanese-style food products being entrees in the nature of bento boxes consisting primarily of fish and seafood and also containing rice. | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Frozen Asian-style appetizers, namely, frozen flour-based dumplings, spring rolls, and flour-based shumai dumplings; pre-packaged prepared Japanese-style food products consisting primarily of rice and also including fish and seafood, namely, sushi and onigiri; pre-packaged prepared Japanese-style food products consisting primarily of rice, and also including fish and seafood, namely, poke bowls being rice-based dishes; pre-packaged prepared Japanese-style food products consisting primarily of rice, and also including fish and seafood, namely, donburi bowls being rice-based dishes; prepared Japanese-style food products being entrees in the nature of bento boxes consisting primarily of rice and also containing fish or seafood. | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 8, 2026 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 4, 2026 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 1, 2026 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 1, 2026 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 1, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 1, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 1, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 14, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 23, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 23, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 23, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 31, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 31, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 31, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 11, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 29, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |