USPTO serial 99473627
CHUYIN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NADELMAN, ANDREA KOYNER
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CHUYIN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Rancho Cucamonga, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephen L Baker
Stephen L Baker Baker and Rannells PA92 East Main StreetSuite 302Somerville, NJ 08876Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Entertainment services in the nature of live musical performances; Entertainment services in the nature of presenting live musical performances; Entertainment services in the nature of live audio performances by a musical group; Entertainment services, namely, live appearances by a musical group; Entertainment services, namely, providing ongoing webisodes featuring a musical group via a global computer network; Providing non-downloadable videos in the field of music via streaming transmission services; Providing on-line music, not downloadable; Providing digital music from the Internet, not downloadable; Providing on-line videos featuring a musical group, not downloadable; Providing online non-downloadable sound recordings featuring music; Providing online non-downloadable audiovisual recordings featuring a musical group; Providing online non-downloadable videos in the field of music; Providing online non-downloadable audio recordings in the field of music; Providing a website featuring non-downloadable videos in the field of music; Providing non-downloadable videos in the field of music via live streaming transmission services; Entertainment services in the nature of live musical performances featuring a puppet performances; Entertainment services in the nature of live vocal performances by musical group featuring a puppet; Entertainment services, namely, personal appearances by a musical group featuring a puppet | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 29, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 29, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 1, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 16, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 16, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 16, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 17, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 16, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 11, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 31, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |