Drawing for X-MAX PRO

USPTO serial 99476496

X-MAX PRO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 661
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ALLEN, LACEY M
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with X-MAX PRO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jason R. Lee

Jason R. Lee The Trademark Firm PLLC131 Franklin Plaza DrSuite 211Franklin, NC 28734

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Bleaching salts; Cleansing milk for toilet purposes; Stain removing preparations; Disposable wipes impregnated with cleansing chemicals or compounds for household use; Automobile, tire, glass and wheel cleaning preparations; Glass cleaners; Polish for furniture and flooring; Chemical cleaning preparations for household purposes; Bleaching preparations for household purposes; Laundry sheets impregnated with detergent; Toilet cleaning gels; Oven cleaning preparations; Scouring powders; Degreasing preparations for cleaning purposes; Detergents for dishwashing machines; Dishwasher detergents in gel form; Dishwasher detergents in liquid form; Dishwasher detergents in powder form; Dishwasher detergents in tablet form; Laundry bleach; Drain openers; Glass cleaning preparations; Dishwasher detergents; Floor polishes; Cleaning preparations for automobiles, shoes; General purpose scouring powder; Disposable wipes impregnated with cleansing compounds for use on kitchenACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 22, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 22, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 22, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 3, 2026GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 3, 2026GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 3, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 12, 2026RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Feb 12, 2026GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 12, 2026GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 12, 2026CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 7, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 7, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 7, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 31, 2025GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 31, 2025GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 31, 2025CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 11, 2025DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 4, 2025MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Dec 4, 2025NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 3, 2025MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Nov 3, 2025NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance