Drawing for SEEV CLARITY ENGINE

USPTO serial 99482792

SEEV CLARITY ENGINE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 681
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PETTICAN, NATHANIEL VINCIENT
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SEEV CLARITY ENGINE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Julian D. Forman

Julian D. Forman JD Patent & Trademark Ltd.1055 West Georgia StreetSuite 2400Vancouver, BC, V6E3P3

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable computer software and mobile applications for bias detection, bias scoring, and content summarization; algorithmic and AI-based analytical tools being downloadable computer software for assessing and mitigating bias in textual, visual, and multimodal data for data-driven content intelligence, real-time bias tracking and institutional reporting; Downloadable computer software for bias scoring and bias mitigation; Downloadable computer software for auditing and detecting bias; Downloadable computer software for analyzing and detecting bias; Downloadable computer software for AI-bias detection, fairness reporting, and data ethics complianceACTIVE—
035Business consulting, data analytics, and advisory services relating to bias detection, algorithmic fairness, and ethical AI implementation; compiling, analyzing, and providing business data and reports concerning bias and compliance metrics; providing business consulting and business auditing services to assist organizations in maintaining fairness, transparency and ethical compliance in digital content and AI systemsACTIVE—
038News and information services in the nature of transmission of news; Digital and wireless broadcasting of audio and video; Internet broadcasting services; Electronic transmission of news summaries, reports, and analysis over computer networks and mobile device; Transmission of news; Electronic transmission of news; News agency services for electronic transmission; Transmission data in the nature of analytics dashboards and bias trend updates over computer networksACTIVE—
041News syndication for the broadcasting industry; News reporter services in the nature of news analysis and news commentary; Providing an internet news portal featuring links to news stories and articles in the field of current events; Providing current events news via a global computer network; Educational content and online newsletters, namely, providing online newsletters in the field of current events; Providing on-line publications in the nature of news articles in the field of current events; Providing information in the field of current events news via a data feed; Providing information and news in the field of current events; Providing training, webinars, workshops and educational content in the nature of non-downloadable educational course materials on media bias analytics and fairness reporting, and all in the field of media literacy, artificial intelligence ethics and responsible information consumptionACTIVE—
042Software as a Service (SaaS) featuring computer software for auditing and detecting bias in publications; Software as a Service (SaaS) featuring computer software for analyzing and detecting bias in publications; Software as a Service (SaaS) featuring computer software for AI bias detection, fairness reporting, and data-ethics compliance in publications including dashboard, analytics visualizations tools, and enterprise-level APIs for bias-trend insights; Software as a Service (SaaS) featuring computer software featuring APIs for auditing, analyzing, detecting, and mitigating bias in digital content, datasets, algorithms, predictive models, and automated decision-making systems; Providing temporary use of non-downloadable software for providing fairness, explainability, transparency, and accountability analytics across text, image, audio, video, and multimodal inputs; Providing temporary use of non-downloadable computer software featuring APIs for bias detection and mitigation in digital advertising, healthcare, education, finance, and other data-driven fields; Providing temporary use of non-downloadable computer software for auditing and improving fairness, transparency, and accountability in automated decision systemsACTIVE—
045Providing regulatory compliance consulting in the nature of online verification, compliance, and certification services in the fields of data ethics, algorithmic accountability, and information integrityACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 26, 2026CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 24, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 23, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 23, 2026ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Sep 2, 2026ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Sep 2, 2026ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Sep 2, 2026ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jul 31, 2026GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jul 31, 2026GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 31, 2026CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 25, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 24, 2026TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 24, 2026ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 24, 2026REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 24, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 24, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 30, 2026EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
Apr 30, 2026TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 30, 2026ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 30, 2026REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 30, 2026GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 30, 2026GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 30, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 17, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 11, 2026NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 6, 2025MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Nov 6, 2025NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance