USPTO serial 99483730
A\
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 653
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CROWDER-SCHAEFER, ANDREW W
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with A\?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Francisco, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Carrie Webb Olson
Carrie Webb Olson Day Pitney LLPOne Federal Street, 29th FloorBoston, MA 02110United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software in the nature of an artificial intelligence model for performing generative text AI tasks and natural language processing AI tasks and for writing content based on a theme, summarizing text, document question-answering and simulating natural conversation; application service provider featuring application programming interface (API) software for performing generative text AI tasks and natural language processing AI tasks and for writing content based on a theme, summarizing text, document question-answering and simulating natural conversation; software as a service (SAAS) featuring software using artificial intelligence for performing generative text AI tasks and natural language processing AI tasks and for writing content based on a theme, summarizing text, document question-answering and simulating natural conversation; application service provider featuring application programming interface (API) software; scientific research and development; research and development services in the fields of artificial intelligence, computer science, and computer software design and development; research, design and development of computer programs and software; providing product development and engineering services in the field of artificial intelligence; providing technical research in the fields of artificial intelligence, computer science, and computer software design and development; providing consultation in the design and development of technology in the fields of artificial intelligence, computer science, and computer software design and development; technological research in the field of deep learning for public policy purposes; technological research in the field of artificial intelligence for public policy purposes; technological research in the field of artificial intelligence and public policy; technological research on the societal implications of artificial intelligence for public policy purposes; technological research to evaluate and understand the capabilities, limitations, and potential for societal impact of artificial intelligence systems for public policy purposes | ACTIVE | May 28, 2021 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 9, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 8, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 8, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 8, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 26, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 19, 2026 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 6, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |