USPTO serial 99484869
TRITON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 645Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PURATH, ANICKA S
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with TRITON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Burlingame, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kelly P. McCarthy
Kelly P. McCarthy Sideman & Bancroft LLPOne Embarcadero Center, Suite 2200San Francisco, CA 94111United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Medical apparatus and instruments for use in endoscopic procedures; Medical tubing for use in endoscopic procedures, namely, endoscope sheaths, overtubes, and tubing for delivering fluids, removing fluids by suction, and providing working channels for endoscopic instruments; Robotic systems for use in medical endoscopic procedures comprised primarily of surgical robots, medical endoscopes, endoscope sheaths and overtubes, medical imaging apparatus for endoscopic procedures, medical apparatus for delivering and suctioning fluids during endoscopic procedures, medical video displays, and downloadable operating system software for surgical robots featuring a graphical user interface; Medical endoscopes; Tools for deployment through an endoscope for performing endoscopic procedures, namely biopsy instruments, injection needles, endoscopic suturing instruments, endoscopic knives, snares, hemostatic clips, forceps, graspers, endoscopic dissection instruments, and electrosurgical instruments; Rigidizing tubing for use in endoscopic procedures being medical endoscopes of fixed and adjustable rigidity; Endoscopic devices nested with tubing being sheaths and overtubes adapted to receive medical endoscopes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 23, 2026 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2026 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 23, 2026 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 25, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 25, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 25, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 25, 2026 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Jun 25, 2026 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 26, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 19, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 12, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 7, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |