USPTO serial 99485272
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Fairfield, CT, US
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael A. Blake
Michael A. Blake/ Law Offices of Michael A. Blake, LLC95 High Street, Suite 5Milford, CT 06460United States| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Shampoos; Hair conditioners; Non-medicated hair serums; Non-medicated hair treatment preparations for cosmetic purposes; Hair creams; Skin creams; Hair spray; Hair mousse; Hair gel and hair mousse; Styling paste for hair; Hair gel | ACTIVE | Feb 1, 2015 |
| 026 | Hair extensions; Wigs; Hair pieces and wigs | ACTIVE | — |
| 044 | Hair salon services; Hair cutting services; Hair colouring services; Hair replacement, hair addition, and hair extension services; Hair coloring services; Hair care services; Hair highlighting services; Hair extension services; Hair tinting services; Hair dyeing services; Hair perming services; Hair styling services; Hair color salon services | ACTIVE | Jan 22, 2014 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 16, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 16, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 1, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 1, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 1, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 19, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 12, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 7, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |