USPTO serial 99490915
THROUGH JESUS, I’M ENOUGH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 653
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- POMEROY-MURPHY, KAITLIN I
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 126
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THROUGH JESUS, I’M ENOUGH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Wichita Falls, TX, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
C. Russell Riddle
C. Russell Riddle The Riddle Firm517 Angle Ridge DriveMurphy, TX 75094United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Shirts; Pants; Hats; Outer jackets | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 25, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 21, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 21, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 21, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 20, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 8, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 11, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 11, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |