USPTO serial 99493103
MYRDDIN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 641Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GUZICK, LEAH A
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 136
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with MYRDDIN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Columbia, MD, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew W. Wahba
Andrew W. Wahba MILES & STOCKBRIDGE P.C.1201 Pennsylvania Ave NW, Suite 900Washington, DC 20004United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable software using an autonomous agentic artificial intelligence (AI) engine for use within a unified cybersecurity platform, namely, utilizing a hierarchical supervisor and worker node architecture to orchestrate complex cybersecurity workflows, where the central supervisor node plans, prioritizes, and delegates tasks to a network of specialized worker nodes, comprising of software supply chain risk management (SCRM) nodes, cloud-native application protection (CNAPP) and cloud detection and response (CDR) nodes, endpoint detection and response (EDR) nodes, artificial intelligence (AI) security posture management (ASPM) nodes, and security orchestration, automation, and response (SOAR) nodes, used in collaboration to autonomously detect, analyze, and remediate cyber threats across development pipelines, cloud infrastructure, endpoints, and artificial intelligence (AI) models | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Software as a Service (SaaS) services featuring software using an autonomous agentic artificial intelligence (AI) engine for use within a unified cybersecurity platform, namely, utilizing a hierarchical supervisor and worker node architecture to orchestrate complex cybersecurity workflows, where the central supervisor node plans, prioritizes, and delegates tasks to a network of specialized worker nodes, comprising of software supply chain risk management (SCRM) nodes, cloud-native application protection (CNAPP) and cloud detection and response (CDR) nodes, endpoint detection and response (EDR) nodes, artificial intelligence (AI) security posture management (ASPM) nodes, and security orchestration, automation, and response (SOAR) nodes, used in collaboration to autonomously detect, analyze, and remediate cyber threats across development pipelines, cloud infrastructure, endpoints, and artificial intelligence (AI) models | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 22, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 22, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 22, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 24, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 24, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 23, 2026 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Jun 23, 2026 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 24, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 12, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 12, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |