USPTO serial 99493679
REDOWL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 653
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RICHARDSON, REBEKAH P
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 134
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with REDOWL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jonathan A. Hyman
Jonathan A. Hyman Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear, LLP2040 Main Street, 14th FloorIrvine, CA 92614United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | (Based on 44(d) Priority Application)(Based on Intent to Use) Providing online nondownloadable software using artificial intelligence (AI) for autonomus payment decisioning and digital payment control; Providing on-line non-downloadable software for real-time digital payment control; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for workflow automation tools for financial management; Platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for use in managing financial spending; Providing a website featuring technology that enables users to access payment workflow automation tools to assist in financial management; Providing a website featuring nondownloadable software for policy management and compliance systems reporting; Platform as a service (PAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for spend control tracking; Providing on-line non-downloadable software for digital tracking of chief financial officer decisioning; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for workflow automation tools for accounts payable; Providing a website featuring non-downloadable software for monitoring and enforcing spend policy systems (Based on Intent to Use) Providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable cloud computing software using artificial intelligence (AI) for autonomus payment decisioning, digital payment control, financial automation, spend management, workflow automation, policy management and compliance systems, and monitoring and enforcing spend policy systems; Providing on-line non-downloadable software using artificial intelligence for autonomus payment decisioning, digital payment control, financial automation, spend management, workflow automation, policy management and compliance systems, and monitoring and enforcing spend policy systems; Providing a website featuring nondownloadable software using artificial intelligence for autonomus payment decisioning, digital payment control, financial automation, spend management, workflow automation, policy management and compliance systems, and monitoring and enforcing spend policy systems; Artificial intelligence as a service (AIAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence for autonomus payment decisioning, digital payment control, financial automation, spend management, workflow automation, policy management and compliance systems, and monitoring and enforcing spend policy systems; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for autonomus payment decisioning, digital payment control, financial automation, spend management, workflow automation, policy management and compliance systems, and monitoring and enforcing spend policy systems; Providing on-line non downloadable software for autonomus payment decisioning, digital payment control, financial automation, spend management, workflow automation, policy management and compliance systems, and monitoring and enforcing spend policy systems; Application service provider (ASP) featuring software for use autonomus payment decisioning, digital payment control, financial automation, spend management, workflow automation, policy management and compliance systems, and monitoring and enforcing spend policy systems; Artificial intelligence as a service (AIAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for autonomus payment decisioning, digital payment control, financial automation, spend management, workflow automation, policy management and compliance systems, and monitoring and enforcing spend policy systems | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 1, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 15, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 14, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 14, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 24, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 23, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 15, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 12, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |