Drawing for CAMELOT EXCALIBUR

USPTO serial 99496639

CAMELOT EXCALIBUR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 661
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GUZICK, LEAH A
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 136

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CAMELOT EXCALIBUR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Andrew W. Wahba

Andrew W. Wahba MILES & STOCKBRIDGE P.C.1201 Pennsylvania Ave NW, Suite 900Washington, DC 20004United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable software module for use within a unified cybersecurity platform, specifically designed for high-assurance identity verification and access control, utilizing agentic artificial intelligence (AI) and quantum technologies, namely, post-quantum cryptography (PQC) and quantum random number generation (QRNG), to generate unforgeable digital identities, acting as a Zero Trust authentication engine that continuously validates user legitimacy, encrypts communications, and prevents unauthorized access to critical cyber environmentsACTIVE—
042Software as a Service (SaaS) services featuring software for use with a quantum-resilient identity and access management (IAM) module, utilizing agentic artificial intelligence (AI) to continuously monitor user behavior and validate access legitimacy in real-time and employing post-quantum cryptography (PQC) and quantum key distribution (QKD) technologies to secure data transmission and authentication credentials, providing a near-unbreakable Zero Trust security layer for entering and operating within protected digital environmentsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 28, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 28, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 28, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 26, 2026XELGAPPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED—
Jun 26, 2026XELRAPPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED—
Mar 27, 2026GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 27, 2026GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 27, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 20, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 12, 2026NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 14, 2025MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Nov 14, 2025NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance