USPTO serial 99497262
INNER TECHNOLOGY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 616
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- I, DAVID C
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with INNER TECHNOLOGY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Desert Hot Springs, CA, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jake D. Siciliano
Jake D. Siciliano Torrey Pines Law Group, PC12636 High Bluff Drive, Suite 400San Diego, CA 92130United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable software and downloadable mobile applications for guiding users through timed standing postures, measuring the user's physical stillness using device motion sensors, and generating numeric practice scores, practice streaks, and session records; downloadable artificial intelligence software for analyzing posture-practice data and providing personalized practice recommendations; wearable computers and smart devices, namely, smart rings, smart bracelets, smart pendants, and headsets for measuring heart rate, heart rate variability, skin temperature, and motion during posture practice | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Educational services, namely, conducting workshops, classes, demonstrations, and training programs in the fields of mindfulness, posture-based stillness practice, breathwork, and personal wellness; providing online non-downloadable instructional videos and written materials in the fields of posture-based stillness practice, breathwork, and personal wellness; educational services, namely, providing training of instructors for certification in the field of posture-based stillness practice | ACTIVE | — |
| 044 | Health assessment services featuring biofeedback and posture-stillness assessments; lifestyle wellness and health consulting featuring biometric and behavioral data; health care services, namely, wellness programs featuring stillness tracking, guided stillness practice, and personalized practice protocols | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 3, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 3, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 3, 2026 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2026 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 3, 2026 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 29, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 29, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 27, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 27, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 27, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 14, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 14, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |