USPTO serial 99497569
TSAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 645Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WOLFSEN, CHRISTIANNE LISBETH
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with TSAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Rockville Centre, NY, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David Postolski
David Postolski Gearhart Law41 River RoadSummit, NJ 07901United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Sauces; seasonings; spices; coffee; tea; beverages made of coffee; beverages made of tea; cocoa; cocoa mixes; fudge; bread; cookies; muffins; cakes; pies; pastries; gingerbread; stuffing mixes containing bread; dessert puddings; candy; frozen yogurt; ice cream; honey; granola; granola snacks; fajitas; pancake mixes; pancake syrup; ketchup; mustard; relish; pasta; pizza; pizza dough; pretzels; processed cereals; rice; salad dressings; gravy mixes; salsa; taco chips; ground ginger; vanilla; sushi | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Entertainment services in the nature of arranging contests, conducting contests, cabarets, presenting live musical performances, amusement centers, nightclubs; casinos, casino gaming; cigar lounge services; Entertainment services, namely, conducting contests; Organizing, arranging, and conducting sports fishing contests and events; Providing recognition and incentives by the way of awards and contests to demonstrate excellence in the field of sports fishing | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 26, 2026 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 19, 2026 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 14, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 14, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 14, 2026 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 9, 2026 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 9, 2026 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 22, 2026 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Jun 22, 2026 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 18, 2026 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2026 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 18, 2026 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 12, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 11, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 11, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 12, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 16, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 14, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |