Drawing for THE GRINDER

USPTO serial 99498572

THE GRINDER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 661
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MCPHERSON RAYBURN, SHAVELL A
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE GRINDER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Walter W. Duft

Walter W. Duft Law Offices of Walter W. DuftP.O. Box 378Clarence Center, NY 14032United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Grinding machines for art glassACTIVENov 13, 2018

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 28, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 28, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 28, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 22, 2026XELGAPPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED—
Jun 22, 2026XELRAPPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED—
Mar 28, 2026GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 28, 2026GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 28, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 24, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 19, 2026NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 15, 2025MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Nov 15, 2025NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance