USPTO serial 99499307
ROYAL CHEF
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 661
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICHAUD-KING, JILLIAN L
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 122
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ROYAL CHEF?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Dearborn, MI, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Victoria G Sedinger
Victoria G Sedinger Taft Stettinus & Hollister LLPONE INDIANA SQUARESUITE 3500Indianapolis, IN 46204Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Cheese spreads; Dried dates; Dried figs; Dried fruits; Frozen fruits; Frozen vegetables; Lemon juice for cooking purposes; Processed olives; Bean dip; Bouillon; Cheese; Cream cheese; Corned beef; Processed eggplant; Eggplant paste; Falafel; Jams; Olive pastes; Pickled jalapeños; Pickled onions; Pickled hot peppers; Soup cubes; Baba ghanoush; Baked beans; Canned sardines; Cooked beans; Meat; Processed apricots; Processed fava beans; Processed garbanzo beans; Processed nuts; Seasoned nuts; ready-to-eat meals consisting primarily of vegetables; Ready-to-eat meals comprised primarily of meats, cheese and also including vegetables; Dairy-based spreads; Yogurt drinks; Processed dates; Hummus chick pea paste; Soup mixes; Tomato paste; Canned tuna; Processed pulses; Processed pumpkin seeds; Processed sunflower seeds; Processed edible melon seeds, not being seasonings or flavorings; Bacon; Hot dogs; Fruit pulp; Pickled fruits; Yogurt | ACTIVE | Jul 15, 2016 |
| 030 | Ajvar for use as a condiment; Coffee; Couscous; Honey; Tea; Bread sticks; Confectionery, namely, candy and chocolate; Crème caramel; Custard; Flour; Halva; Pasta; Pastries; Pepper paste for use as a seasoning; Rice pudding; Turkish delight; Vinegar; Bulgur; Flavored, sweetened gelatin desserts; Molasses; Cocoa spreads; Candy; Chocolate cakes; Creme caramels; Chili pepper pastes being condiments; Flatbread; Puff pastry dough; Powdered dessert puddings; Bakery desserts; Frozen dough | ACTIVE | Aug 10, 2016 |
| 032 | Fruit drinks and fruit juices; Fruit flavoured carbonated drinks; Fruit juice; Pomegranate juice; Mixed fruit juice; Fruit juice concentrates; Fruit juice beverages; Organic fruit juice; Carbonated drinks, non-alcoholic | ACTIVE | Mar 10, 2023 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 15, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 15, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 15, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 12, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 12, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 12, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 20, 2026 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 16, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |