USPTO serial 99499594
WIPRO WINGS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 681
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MANCA, ALBERTO I
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WIPRO WINGS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Bangalore Karnataka, IN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Naresh Kilaru
Naresh Kilaru Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP901 New York Avenue, NWWashington, DC 20001United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable software using artificial intelligence for collecting, analyzing, and organizing data in the field of information technology; Downloadable business process management software; downloadable computer software for remotely managing the information technology systems of others; Downloadable computer software for generating business analysis reports; Downloadable computer software, namely, artificial intelligence (AI) based platforms for monitoring, managing, and automating operational technology infrastructure and industrial control systems for use in operational technology (OT) management; Downloadable computer software, namely, artificial intelligence (AI) based platforms for IT system optimization | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Consultancy in the field of software design; Computer services, namely, remote management of the operational technology (OT) systems of others; Computer services, namely, on-site management of operational technology (OT) systems of others; Consulting in the field of information technology, namely, computer software consulting, IT project management consulting, and technical consulting in the field of artificial intelligence (AI) software customization; Planning, design and management of information technology systems; Computer programming and software design; Consulting services in the field of cloud computing; Computer technology support services, namely, help desk services; Consulting services in the field of software as a service (SAAS); Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for generating business analysis reports, automation and management of information technology systems, and analyzing data; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for automating IT service management, incident management, workflow management, and infrastructure monitoring for the purpose of streamlining IT operations; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for monitoring information technology systems, generating compliance reports, tracking operational data, and automating governance workflows for the purpose of improving regulatory compliance; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for analyzing operational and customer interaction data, providing automated recommendations, managing service requests, and optimizing business processes for the purpose of optimizing consumer experience | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 15, 2026 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 12, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 12, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 12, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 5, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 5, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 5, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 21, 2026 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Aug 21, 2026 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| May 22, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 22, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 22, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 13, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 13, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 13, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 24, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 24, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 24, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 23, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 21, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 17, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |