USPTO serial 99500132
SCREWED UP!
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 653
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TRUSILO, KELLY JEAN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SCREWED UP!?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Sun Valley, ID, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Vivek Jayaram
Vivek Jayaram Jayaram PLLC54 W 21st St., Suite 801New York, NY 10010United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Tops as clothing; Bottoms as clothing; Headwear; Hats; Belts for clothing; Sweatshirts; T-shirts | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 23, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 25, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 25, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 25, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 26, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 24, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 20, 2026 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 17, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |