USPTO serial 99500562
FOOD INTELLIGENCE ECONOMY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 653
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THOMPSON, HEATHER
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FOOD INTELLIGENCE ECONOMY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Meichelle R. MacGregor
Meichelle R. MacGregor Cowan, Liebowitz & Latman, P.C.114 West 47th StreetNew York, NY 10036United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Artificial intelligence as a service (AIAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for providing analytical tools for the qualitative analysis of food and the health and nutritional advantages or disadvantages for human diet, agriculture and the food industry for purposes of general nutrition, and for the qualitative analysis of the biochemical composition and function of food for use in public health intervention, food quality, ingredient discovery and selection, product development, dietary and agricultural guidelines, meal formulation, food labeling, and food security; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for providing analytical tools for the qualitative analysis of food and the health and nutritional advantages or disadvantages for human diet, agriculture and the food industry for purposes of general nutrition, and for the qualitative analysis of the biochemical composition and function of food for use in public health intervention, food quality, ingredient discovery and selection, product development, dietary and agricultural guidelines, meal formulation, food labeling, and food security | ACTIVE | — |
| 044 | Dietary and nutritional guidance; Providing nutritional information about food in the nature of a public online database consisting of medical and biomedical information relating to the biochemical composition and function of food and health and nutritional advantages or disadvantages of food based on the biochemical composition and function of food for purposes of general nutrition, as well as the biochemical composition and function of food for purposes relating to public health intervention, food quality, ingredient discovery and selection, product development, dietary and agricultural guidelines, meal formulation, food labeling, and food security | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 27, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 27, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 27, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 26, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 26, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 26, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 26, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 17, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 17, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |