USPTO serial 99501161
TRAQ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 653
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COUEY,JORDAN ELIZABETH
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 130
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TRAQ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
TAMPA, FL, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph A. R. Gerber
Joseph A. R. Gerber Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear, LLP2040 Main Street, 14th FloorIrvine, CA 92614United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Surgical implants comprising allograft materials, namely, human allograft bone and tissue; human allograft tissue in the nature of demineralized bone matrix, namely, human allograft bone and tissue used for bone grafts in medical procedures; bone void fillers consisting of human biological materials; Bone-piercing surgical implants comprised of human allograft bone and related tissue, namely, surgical implants comprised of living tissues | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | Medical instruments for use in surgery; Medical instruments for performing sacroiliac joint fusion stabilization; Medical instruments for piercing bone; Medical instruments for piercing bone to perform sacroiliac joint fusion stabilization; Surgical implants comprising artificial material; Surgical implants composed of metal; Bone-piercing surgical implants composed of metal | ACTIVE | — |
| 044 | Medical services, namely, performing sacroiliac joint fusion; Medical consultation services, namely, providing consultation and support being medical consultation to physicians during surgery; Medical consultation services, namely, providing medical consultation regarding chronic pain, implant procedures, procedure reimbursement, and patient instruction | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 15, 2026 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 8, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 18, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 18, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 18, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 18, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 18, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 18, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 12, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 17, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |