USPTO serial 99502684
NUMERA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NUNLEY, CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NUMERA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Dover, DE, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Cecilia Dubravec
Cecilia Dubravec Swyft Legal, LLC1814 North Memorial WayHouston, TX 77007United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable software for financial data management, reporting and analytics; downloadable software for accounting automation and financial workflow management, downladable software for financial forecasting, kpi tracking and business performance analysis. | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Business management services, namely, managing office functions in the nature of human resources (HR) management, payroll administration, employee recordkeeping, onboarding, time and attendance tracking, and workforce analytics for others; Business consultation in the field of accounting, payroll, human resources, and business process optimization | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for bookkeeping, accounting, financial reporting, financial data analysis, cash-flow forecasting, and automation of business processes; Providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software and applications for managing accounting workflows, reconciling transactions, processing payments, generating financial insights, and integrating with third-party applications | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 25, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 28, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 28, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 28, 2026 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 28, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 27, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 27, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 27, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 26, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 12, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 18, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |