USPTO serial 99502736
CHRISTINE LE TENNIER HÉNAFF
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BURRUS, JESSICA E
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 121
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CHRISTINE LE TENNIER HÉNAFF?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Rosporden, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Amanda M. Prose
Amanda M. Prose WESTMAN, CHAMPLIN & KOEHLER, P.A.121 South Eighth Street, Suite 1100Minneapolis, MN 55402United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Meat, fish, poultry, and game; meat extracts; fish extracts; fish tartares; seafood tartares; preserved, frozen, dried, and cooked fruits and vegetables; preserved, dried, and cooked seaweed; preserved sea beans; preserved salicornia; jellies, seaweed jellies, fish jellies, seafood jellies; meat jellies; jams, compotes; eggs; milk and dairy products; milk drinks; edible oils and fats; edible seaweed; fish rillettes and preserves; seafood rillettes and preserves; cooked or prepared dishes, preserved, semi-fresh or fresh, based on fish, meat, poultry or game; culinary preparations based on seaweed or fish; culinary preparations containing seaweed molecules; fish soups; agar-agar for food use; seaweed extracts for food use; alginates for food use in all forms, including molecular forms, pearls, beads, and spheres; alginate envelopes (for food use) containing cooked fruit, jellies, syrups, or sauces; dietary products and prepared dishes based on algae for food and non-medical use; meal replacements based on algae for non-medical use; canned seafood; canned meat, poultry, or game; pâtés, poultry or game pâtés; rillettes; fish rillettes; rillettes made from seafood | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Coffee, tea, cocoa, sugar, rice, tapioca, sago, coffee substitutes; flours and preparations made from cereals; flours and preparations made from legumes; bread, pastries, and confectionery, ice cream; honey, molasses syrup; yeast, baking powder; salt, mustard; vinegar, sauces (condiments); sauces (condiments) that may be presented in a seaweed-based casing; mayonnaise; spices; ice cream; sandwiches; pizzas; pancakes (food); seaweed (condiments); seaweed-based pasta; food preparations based on starchy foods and seaweed; food preparations based on legumes and seaweed; biscuits; cakes; rusks; sweets; chocolate; beverages based on cocoa, coffee, chocolate or tea | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 16, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 16, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 1, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 1, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 1, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 12, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 26, 2025 | TAEA | TEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED | — |
| Nov 26, 2025 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 18, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |