USPTO serial 99502858
CANDLEFISH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 681
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NADEAU, MADELINE JEAN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CANDLEFISH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David F Dockery
David F Dockery The Navitas Intellectual Property Group LLC4600 South Syracuse StreetSuite 900Denver, CO 80237Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Software as a service (SAAS) featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for productivity and workflow optimization; Software as a service (SAAS) featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for document processing; Software as a service (SAAS) featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for design automation; Software as a service (SAAS) featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for inventory management; Software as a service (SAAS) featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for business process automation; Software as a service (SAAS) featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for custom workflow development; Software as a service (SAAS) featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for engraving automation; Software authoring; Software design and development; Software engineering services; Computer software consultancy; Computer software consultation; Computer software design; Computer software design for others; Computer software design, computer programming, and maintenance of computer software; Computer software development; Custom design of computer software; Developing computer software; Developing customized software for others; Updating of computer software. | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 26, 2026 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 8, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 8, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 8, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 8, 2026 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Jul 8, 2026 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 8, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 8, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 8, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 12, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 18, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |