Drawing for FORKSURE

USPTO serial 99507206

FORKSURE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 681
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SUTHERLAND, ANDREW J
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FORKSURE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Andrew B. Murphy, Esq.

Andrew B. Murphy, Esq. The Law Firm of Andrew B. Murphy, LLC224 W 35th St, Ste 500New York, NY 10001United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Food safety monitoring devices, namely, handheld diagnostic electrochemical biosensors for detecting foodborne pathogens and non-pathogenic food contaminants in the nature of food allergens and food spoilage markers on food surfaces; downloadable software for use with handheld electrochemical biosensors to detect foodborne pathogens, food allergens, and food spoilage markers on food surfaces and to analyze and display food safety test resultsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 15, 2026CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 14, 2026GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 14, 2026XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Oct 14, 2026GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 14, 2026CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 21, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 10, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 10, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 10, 2026NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Sep 10, 2026PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Sep 10, 2026PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Sep 1, 2026TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 1, 2026ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 1, 2026REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 10, 2026MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 10, 2026ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 26, 2026GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 26, 2026GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 26, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 26, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 12, 2026NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 20, 2025MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Nov 20, 2025NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance