Drawing for COHERENCE

USPTO serial 99507322

COHERENCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 681
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KON, ELISSA GARBER
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with COHERENCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kregg Koch

Kregg Koch Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear, LLP2040 Main Street, 14th FloorIrvine, CA 92614United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Electrical stimulation apparatus for nerves and brain tissue for therapeutic purposes; Electronic nerve stimulators for medical purposes; Nerve stimulator apparatus; Medical devices, namely, pulse generators for neurostimulation, neurotherapy, and disease diagnostics; Medical device for detecting cancer; Medical device for treating cancer; Wearable monitors used to measure biometric data for medical use; Surgical implants in the nature of electrical stimulation apparatus composed of metal; electrical stimulation therapy apparatus for pain relief; Medical diagnostic apparatus for detecting disease progression and symptoms with embedded operating Software in a Medical Device (SiMD)ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 14, 2026CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 29, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 28, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 28, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 26, 2026XELGAPPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED—
Jun 26, 2026XELRAPPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED—
Mar 27, 2026GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 27, 2026GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 27, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 26, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 23, 2026NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 20, 2025MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Nov 20, 2025NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance