Drawing for FORTIFIED SECURITY SOLUTIONS

USPTO serial 99507521

FORTIFIED SECURITY SOLUTIONS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 661
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KING,ROBERT E
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 133

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FORTIFIED SECURITY SOLUTIONS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Steven E. Tiller

Steven E. Tiller Whiteford, Taylor & Preston, LLPSeven Saint Paul StreetBaltimore, MD 21202-1636United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
037Installation of security systems; Installation, maintenance and repair of fire and security alarms; Installation and maintenance of AI cameras; Installation of access control systems for security systems; Installation of gates; Installation and maintenance of audio/visual systemsACTIVE—
042Cloud systems, namely, providing temporary use of non-downloadable cloud-based software for monitoring security systemsACTIVE—
045Monitoring services, namely, monitoring of security alarm systemsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 5, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 5, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 5, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 28, 2026GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 28, 2026GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 28, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 22, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 22, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 22, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 2, 2026GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 2, 2026GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 2, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 26, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 20, 2025MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Nov 20, 2025NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 20, 2025NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance