USPTO serial 99508001
CITRIX AIDRIEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 681
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JARAMILLO, JAVIER R
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CITRIX AIDRIEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Fort Lauderdale, FL, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Deborah J. Peckham
Deborah J. Peckham Barclay Damon LLP160 Federal Street, Suite 1001Boston, MA 02110United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable computer software using artificial intelligence for providing a virtual assistant for assisting a user by making contextual recommendations for the purpose of troubleshooting, managing and operating computing systems, cloud infrastructure and computer hardware and software systems; Providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable computer software using artificial intelligence for providing a virtual assistant to assist a user regarding the features, performance, insights, and functions of computer software, networks, and computer hardware, together with capabilities to automate the management, monitoring and configuration of the foregoing; Providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable chatbot software using artificial intelligence for managing information technology-related tasks and providing information technology product support to customers; Providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable computer chatbot software for simulating conversation for the purpose of computer software, computer hardware, cloud infrastructure and information technology troubleshooting | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 28, 2026 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 28, 2026 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2026 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 28, 2026 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2026 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 29, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 29, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 29, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 29, 2026 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2026 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 29, 2026 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 30, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 30, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 30, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 30, 2026 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2026 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 30, 2026 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 29, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 24, 2026 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 20, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |