USPTO serial 99508282
HYDRA HOST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 645Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BONEN-CLARK, HOPE MICHELLE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 128
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with HYDRA HOST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David L. Principe
David L. Principe Phillips Lytle LLP125 Main StreetSuite 800Buffalo, NY 14203Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Procurement consultation, namely, analysis and redefinition of purchasing processes in the field of computer hardware; Procurement, namely, purchasing computer hardware for others | ACTIVE | Jun 11, 2021 |
| 042 | Infrastructure as a service (IAAS) services being hosting servers for use by others; Infrastructure as a service (IAAS) services, namely, hosting computer software platforms for managing graphics processing units (GPU) and graphics processing units (GPU) infrastructure; Cloud computing featuring software for use in managing graphics processing units (GPU); Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for orchestrating data center infrastructure and graphics processing units (GPU) resources | ACTIVE | Jun 11, 2021 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 9, 2026 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 22, 2026 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2026 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 22, 2026 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 20, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 20, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 20, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 17, 2026 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Jun 17, 2026 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 29, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 20, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 20, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |