USPTO serial 99511940
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Carson City, NV, US
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RAJESH VIKRAM FOTEDAR
RAJESH VIKRAM FOTEDAR COGNITION IP50 California Street, Suite 1500San Francisco, CA 94111United States| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for generating predictions based on integration of enterprise data and internal knowledge sources with external contextual data and third-party information; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for unifying enterprise data ecosystems and generating business operations insights and recommendations; Providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software for artificial intelligence, machine learning, multi-agent reasoning for enterprise intelligence, value creation analysis, data modeling, data harmonization, semantic data processing, predictive analytics, business decision support, and enterprise risk assessment | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 4, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 4, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 4, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 4, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 30, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 28, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 24, 2026 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 23, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 23, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |