USPTO serial 99511961
AURA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 653
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SCLEIDOROVICH, JOANNA YAEL
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 128
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AURA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Keith Toms, Esq.
Keith Toms, Esq. McCarter & English, LLP265 Franklin StreetBoston, MA 02110United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Robotic imaging apparatus for analyzing and characterizing particulates; Robotic imaging apparatus for analyzing cells, proteins, antibodies, DNA, RNA, viral vectors, capsids, lipid nanoparticles, exosomes, and therapeutic applications thereof; Robotic imaging apparatus for particle analysis in protein, cell, and gene therapy formulations; Robotic imaging apparatus for quality control and stability testing of pharmaceutical and biopharmaceutical products; Robotic imaging apparatus for detecting, measuring, and characterizing particulate contamination, viral vector aggregation, viral vector stability, viral vector formulations, excipient degradation, and cell viability; Laboratory imaging instruments for analyzing and characterizing particulates; Laboratory imaging instruments for analyzing cells, proteins, antibodies, DNA, RNA, viral vectors, capsids, lipid nanoparticles, exosomes, and therapeutic applications thereof; Laboratory imaging instruments for particle analysis in protein, cell, and gene therapy formulations; Laboratory imaging instruments for quality control and stability testing of pharmaceutical and biopharmaceutical products; Laboratory imaging instruments for detecting, measuring, and characterizing particulate contamination, viral vector aggregation, viral vector stability, viral vector formulations, excipient degradation, and cell viability; Downloadable computer operating software for laboratory imaging instruments and robotic imaging apparatus; none of the foregoing including a spectrometer | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 10, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 9, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 9, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 9, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 10, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 10, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 10, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 23, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 23, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 23, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |