USPTO serial 99512001
FIGLIOTECH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ELTON, DAVID JONATHAN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 686 means your mark is published in the USPTO Official Gazette and in the 30-day opposition period. If no opposition is filed, prosecution typically continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. Monitor the opposition window. After it closes, watch for Notice of Allowance (intent-to-use) or registration (use-based).
Need help with FIGLIOTECH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Ponte Vedra Beach, FL, US
Ponte Vedra Beach, FL, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Deborah Giambruno
837 Baytree LanePonte Vedra Beach, FL 32082United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for capturing telematics data and visual context for analysis of behavior, scoring, alerting, communicating, trip activity, and providing eductation for use in connection with driving; Design and development of software in the field of mobile applications; Design and development of software for machine learning; Providing online non-downloadable software using artificial intelligence (AI) for machine learning for processing and analysis of telematics information, computer vision inferences, context generation, risk scoring, event classification, behavioral pattern detection, threshold monitoring, and provision of feedback for improvement of driver safety and mobility; Providing online non-downloadable software using machine learning for improvement of driver safety and mobility; Research in the field of software for machine learning; Design and development of computer software for machine learning; Design and development of computer software for statistical machine learning; Research in the field of computer software for statistical machine learning; Application service provider (ASP) featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for machine learning; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software using artificial intelligence (AI) for processing and analysis of telematics information, computer vision inferences, context generation, risk scoring, event classification, behavioral pattern detection, threshold monitoring, and provision of feedback for improvement of driver safety and mobility for use in connection with driver safety and mobility | ACTIVE | Mar 2, 2025 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 27, 2026 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2026 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 21, 2026 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2026 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 29, 2026 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2026 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 29, 2026 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2026 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 15, 2026 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2026 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 15, 2026 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 17, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 17, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 17, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 17, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 17, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 17, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 17, 2026 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| May 17, 2026 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 28, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 28, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 28, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 28, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 28, 2025 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 23, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 23, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |