Drawing for BEAMO

USPTO serial 99514158

BEAMO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 653
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MACIOL II, EUGENE VALENTINE-JO
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BEAMO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Paulo A. de Almeida

Paulo A. de Almeida Wolf, Rifkin, Shapiro, Schulman & Rabkin, LLP11400 W. Olympic Blvd., 9th Fl.Los Angeles, CA 90064United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Loudspeakers; Multimedia projectors; Digital projectors; Self-acting focussing projectors; Profile projectors; Projection screens; Video projectors; Liquid crystal display (LCD) projectors; Holographic projection apparatus; Mini beam projectors; Remote controls for projectors; Television apparatus for projection purposes; Humanoid robots having communication and learning functions for assisting and entertaining people; LCD projectorsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 29, 2026GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 29, 2026GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 29, 2026CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jul 7, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 6, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 6, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 2, 2026TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 2, 2026ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 2, 2026REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 6, 2026GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 6, 2026GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 6, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 30, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 12, 2026NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 24, 2025MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Nov 24, 2025NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance