USPTO serial 99516430
FLO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 653
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GARDNER, DAWNA BERYL
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 117
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FLO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Rosezena J. Pierce
Rosezena J. Pierce R.J. PIERCE LAW GROUP, P.C.205 N. MichiganSuite 810Chicago, IL 60601Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Professional business consulting; Business management consulting; Business consulting services; Business development consulting services; Business consulting for enterprises; Business consulting services in business leadership development and business management; Business consulting services for start-up companies; Consulting services in business organization and management; Business support services, namely, business consulting to freelancers, start-ups, existing businesses and non-profit organizations; Business management; Business management assistance; Business information management; Business management analysis; Business records management; Advisory services relating to business management and business operations; Financial records management; Business strategic planning services | ACTIVE | Feb 9, 2024 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 8, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 9, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 9, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 9, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 31, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 31, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 31, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 23, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 25, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |