Drawing for ARTEFACTS

USPTO serial 99523443

ARTEFACTS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 661
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HILLIARD, JESSICA LYNN
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 120

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ARTEFACTS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Rebecca Liebowitz

Rebecca Liebowitz Venable LLPPO Box 34385Washington, DC 20043-9998United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for robotics application development; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for testing, tracking, and optimizing applications in the field of robotics; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for testing, tracking, and optimizing the effects of algorithm parameters in different environments with respect to robotic applications; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for data processing and analysis in the field of robotics; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for verifying and optimizing robotic application parameters to real-world environments; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for performing robotic application software regression testing; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for simulating robotic application performance; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for generating and analyzing robotic application performance data; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for generating metrics, charts, images and videos in the field of robotics; Platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for robotics application development; Platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for testing, tracking, and optimizing applications in the field of robotics; Platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for testing, tracking, and optimizing the effects of algorithm parameters in different environments with respect to robotic applications; Platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for data processing and analysis in the field of robotics; Platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for verifying and optimizing robotic application parameters to real-world environments; Platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for performing robotic application software regression testing; Platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for simulating robotic application performance; Platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for generating and analyzing robotic application performance data; Platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for generating metrics, charts, images and videos in the field of robotics; Technical consulting in the field of monitoring technological functions of humanoid robots with artificial intelligence (AI)ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 31, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 24, 2026AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Jul 24, 2026PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Jul 7, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 7, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 7, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 8, 2026GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 8, 2026GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 8, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 3, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 12, 2026NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 12, 2026NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 1, 2025MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Dec 1, 2025NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance