Drawing for ROPA TECHNOLOGIES

USPTO serial 99524636

ROPA TECHNOLOGIES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 653
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BURCHAM, NATHAN D
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ROPA TECHNOLOGIES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeremy Gustrowsky

Jeremy Gustrowsky Woodard Emhardt Henry Reeves & Wagner LLP111 Monument Circle, Suite 3700Indianapolis, IN 46204United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Training aids, in the nature of training devices controlled by a central processing unit (CPU) that is integral to a Programmable Logic Controller (PLC) programmed for human performance safety training of workers and managers for error-free operation of equipment using INPO Human Performance ToolsPARTIALLY PAID—
016Behavior reinforcement products for office and plant-wide locations in the form of (digital or permanent) signage, place-keeping, and flagging using place-keepers made of durable material such as plasticPARTIALLY PAID—
035General business consulting services in the field of human performance safety trainingPARTIALLY PAID—
040custom production of central processing unit (CPU) module that is integral to a Programmable Logic Controller (PLC) programmed for human performance safety training of workers and managers for error-free operation of equipment using INPO Human Performance ToolsPARTIALLY PAID—
041In-person training, virtual training using knowledge and evaluation techniques, e-learning platform training for knowledge base only, in the field of human performance safety training operations applicable to all forms of Human Performance equipment operationPARTIALLY PAID—
042Evaluation of client safety culture and safety training programs, review of company error-events, and final determination of onsite success of the Human Performance program as delivered; preparation of behaviour forming signage and devicesPARTIALLY PAID—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 6, 2026GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 6, 2026GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 6, 2026CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jun 24, 2026TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 24, 2026CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 24, 2026TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 6, 2026GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 6, 2026GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 6, 2026CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 3, 2026DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 24, 2026MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Mar 24, 2026NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 2, 2025MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Dec 2, 2025NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance