USPTO serial 99527658
KLEIO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 653
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEE, CATHERINE ANNE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with KLEIO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Dallas, TX, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John Pickerill
John Pickerill Fredrikson & Byron, P.A.60 South 6th StreetSuite 1500Minneapolis, MN 55402Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Providing online non-downloadable computer software platforms for cloud-native document intelligence and engagement to ingest and store content, including document, rich-media assets, photos, and other data files, provide artificial intelligence and machine learning powered document processing including classification, extraction, redaction, and image enhancement services; Providing online non-downloadable computer software platforms for cloud-native document intelligence and engagement using generative artificial intelligence allowing users to access and engage with content including natural language and contextual search, summarization, language translation, and chat features, enable automated workflows and human-in-the-loop validation or processing, enable agentic artificial intelligence workflows, and ensure digital formats are tamper proof and future accessible and immutable | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 15, 2026 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2026 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2026 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 3, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 3, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 3, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 10, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 10, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 10, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 7, 2026 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 12, 2026 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 3, 2025 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2025 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |